Guia docente 2023_24
Escola Superior de Enxeñaría Informática
Grado en Ingeniería Informática
 Subjects
  Architectural design of large software systems
   Assessment
  Description Qualification Training and Learning Results
Laboratory practical Regular attendance to the laboratory and participation (question answering, etc.)

EXPECTED RESULTS IN THE SUBJECT BEING EVALUATED: LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5, LO6
5 A4
A5
B9
C13
C30
D8
D9
D14
Presentation Preparation and presentation in small groups of a topic, his oral presentation and practical examples. Clarity, quality and time adjustment of the presentation will be taken into account.

EXPECTED RESULTS IN THE SUBJECT BEING EVALUATED: LO1, LO5, LO6
15 A3
A4
B1
B5
B9
C22
C25
C27
C28
C30
D4
D5
D6
D7
D8
D9
D10
D11
D14
Objective questions exam Individual multiple-choice tests which include theoretical and practical contents of the subject

EXPECTED RESULTS IN THE SUBJECT BEING EVALUATED: LO1, LO3, LO5, LO6
35 A3
A5
B5
B9
C13
C19
C22
C25
C28
C32
D6
Project Project development integrating subject contents.

EXPECTED RESULTS IN THE SUBJECT BEING EVALUATED: LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5, LO6
45 A2
A3
A5
B5
B9
C19
C22
C25
C27
C28
C32
D5
D6
D7
D11
 
Other comments on the Evaluation

CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT SYSTEM

Assistance and participation in laboratory

Description: regular attendance and participation in the laboratory sessions (asking doubts about the work, etc.).

Applied methodology: laboratory practical.

% Qualification: 5%.

% Minimum: There is no required minimum.

Evaluated training and learning results: A4, A5, B9, C13, C30, D8, D9, D14.

Expected results in the subject being evaluated: LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5, LO6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oral presentation

Description: preparation and presentation in small groups of a topic, its oral exposition and application approach. The clarity of the exposure, the quality of the presentation and the adjustment to the maximum pre-established time will be taken into account.

Applied methodology: presentation.

% Qualification: 15%.

Minimum %: a grade equal to or greater than 3.5 points must be obtained.

Evaluated training and learning results: A3, A4, B1, B5, B9, C22, C25, C27, C28, C30, D4, D5, D6, D7, D8, D9, D10, D11, D14.

Expected results in the subject being evaluated: LO1, LO5, LO6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Written exam 1

Description: written individual multiple choice test on the theoretical contents of the first part.

Applied methodology: objective questions exam.

% Qualification: 17.5%.

Minimum %: a grade equal to or greater than 3.5 points must be obtained.

Evaluated training and learning results: A3, A5, B5, B9, C13, C19, C22, C25, C28, C32, D6.

Expected results in the subject being evaluated: LO1, LO3, LO5, LO6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Written exam 2

Description: written individual multiple choice test on the theoretical contents of the second part.

Applied methodology: objective questions exam.

% Qualification: 17.5%.

Minimum %: a grade equal to or greater than 3.5 points must be obtained.

Evaluated training and learning results: A3, A5, B5, B9, C13, C19, C22, C25, C28, C32, D6.

Expected results in the subject being evaluated: LO1, LO3, LO5, LO6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Projects deliverable 1

Description: first delivery of the projects that integrate contents seen in the matter.

Applied methodology: project.

% Qualification: 22.5%.

Minimum %: a grade equal to or greater than 3.5 points must be obtained.

Evaluated training and learning results: A2, A3, A5, B5, B9, C19, C22, C25, C27, C28, C32, D5, D6, D7, D11.

Expected results in the subject being evaluated: LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5, LO6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Projects deliverable 2

Description: second delivery of projects that integrate contents seen in the matter.

Applied methodology: project.

% Qualification: 22.5%.

Minimum %: a grade equal to or greater than 3.5 points must be obtained.

Evaluated training and learning results: A2, A3, A5, B5, B9, C19, C22, C25, C27, C28, C32, D5, D6, D7, D11.

Expected results in the subject being evaluated: LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5, LO6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

If a student does not take any of the tests, a grade of 0 will be assigned to it.

GLOBAL ASESSMENT SYSTEM

Procedure for choosing the global assessment modality: once the period of one month from the beginning of the semester has passed, a period of 10 working days will be enabled for the enrolled students to formally express their intention to be assessed under the global assessment system.

Written exam

Description: written individual multiple choice test on the theoretical contents.

Applied methodology: objective questions exam.

% Qualification: 40%.

Minimum %: a grade equal to or greater than 5 points must be obtained.

Evaluated training and learning results: A3, A5, B5, B9, C13, C19, C22, C25, C28, C32, D6.

Expected results in the subject being evaluated: LO1, LO3, LO5, LO6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Projects deliverable 1

Description: first delivery of the projects that integrate contents seen in the matter.

Applied methodology: project.

% Qualification: 30%.

Minimum %: a grade equal to or greater than 5 points must be obtained.

Evaluated training and learning results: A2, A3, A5, B5, B9, C19, C22, C25, C27, C28, C32, D5, D6, D7, D11.

Expected results in the subject being evaluated: LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5, LO6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Projects deliverable 2

Description: second delivery of projects that integrate contents seen in the matter.

Applied methodology: project.

% Qualification: 30%.

Minimum %: a grade equal to or greater than 5 points must be obtained.

Evaluated training and learning results: A2, A3, A5, B5, B9, C19, C22, C25, C27, C28, C32, D5, D6, D7, D11.

Expected results in the subject being evaluated: LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5, LO6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR EXTRAORDINARY CALL AND FINAL DEGREE

The continuous and global evaluation systems described above will be used.

RECORD QUALIFICATION PROCESS

Regardless of the evaluation system and the call, the average mark, the minimum score to pass the subject is 5. On the other hand, if the minimum score is not exceeded in any part of the evaluation, but the overall score is greater than 4 (out of 10), the grade in the minutes will be 4.

EVALUATION DATES

The dates of the tests corresponding to the continuous assessment system will be published in the calendar of activities, available on the ESEI website https://esei.uvigo.es/docencia/horarios/.

The official exam dates of the different calls, officially approved by the Xunta de Centro of the ESEI, are published on the ESEI website https://esei.uvigo.es/docencia/horarios/.

USE OF MOBILE DEVICES

All students are reminded of the prohibition of the use of mobile devices in exercises and practices, in compliance with article 13.2.d) of the University Student Statute, regarding the duties of university students, which establishes the duty to "Refrain from using or cooperating in fraudulent procedures in the assessment activities, in the delivered assignments or in official documents of the university."

TUTORING SCHEDULE AND PERSONAL TUTORING REQUEST

The tutoring schedule, and the way to request a personal tutoring, is published in the personal page of the teaching staff, accessible through https://esei.uvigo.es/docencia/profesorado/.

Universidade de Vigo            | Reitoría | Campus Universitario | C.P. 36.310 Vigo (Pontevedra) | España | Tlf: +34 986 812 000