Open talk among a group of students. Can be focused on a subject of the contents of the subject, on the analysis of a case, on the result of a project, exercise or problem previously developed in a master session...
In the discussion, knowledge, skills and attitudes are evaluated.
Objectives: To evaluate higher thinking (analysis and synthesis).
18
A3 A4
B1 B3 B4 B5
C33 C34
D1 D2 D3 D4
Mentored work
The students, individually or in groups, carry out activities, which can be
- Monographic works, search for information in publications, databases, articles, books... on a specific topic.
- Preparation of seminars, research, reports, essays, conferences, etc.
- Reviews of current scientific articles.
- Projects (design and development of projects).
Objectives:
- Acquire and consolidate knowledge
- Evaluate knowledge.
- Developing transversal skills and competences
15
A1 A2 A4
B1 B4 B5 B7
C33 C34
D1 D2 D3
Objective questions exam
Tests that evaluate knowledge that include closed questions with different answer alternatives (true/false, multiple choice, matching of elements...). Students select an answer from a limited number of possibilities (preferably four) with a reduction for failure of a value equal to the percentage of success (-0.25 pts. in the case of four possible answers, if the value of the question was 1 pt).
The test of objective questions only evaluates knowledge. It does not evaluate skills or attitudes. It evaluates thinking skills inferior. It assesses knowledge, understanding and application.
20
A1 A2 A3
B2 B4
C33
Presentation
Exposure by the students to the teacher and/or a group of students of an aspect of the subject's contents or results of a work, exercise, project... You can carry out individually or in a group.
In the presentation, knowledge, skills and attitudes are evaluated.
The objectives are to evaluate higher thinking (analysis and synthesis).
17
Systematic observation
Careful, rational, planned and systematic perception to describe and record the manifestations of student behaviour. It is possible to assess learning and actions and how they are carried out valuing order, precision, dexterity, efficiency... The aim is to evaluate higher thinking.
30
A1 A2 A3 A4
B1 B3 B7
C33 C34
D1 D2 D3 D4
Other comments on the Evaluation
Students who do not pass the subject in continuous training at the first opportunity of each academic year, in which the distribution of evaluation weights is as stablished above, will have the possibility of having an exam of objective questions, worth 100% of the final mark, in successive calls that are not the first opportunity of each academic year.
Ethical commitment: Students are expected to
behave ethically. If unethical behaviour is detected (copying, plagiarism, use
of unauthorised electronic devices,...), the student will be considered to be
ineligible to pass the subject. Depending on the type of unethical behaviour
detected, it could be concluded that the student has not reached the necessary
skills to overcome the subject. Students are expected to behave in a respectful
and dignified manner and to collaborate with the teaching system, teaching
staff, coordination and administrative and services personnel of the Master's
degree. Any question due to the lack of ethical and dignified behaviour of the
student body may have repercussions on the evaluation of the subject.
