The teaching and evaluation of this subject is responsibility of two areas of knowledge: The area of Constitutional Law and the Area of Public International Law. The area of Public International Law will reach the lessons 1 and 2; 5 and 6; and 11- 13, that willl be developed in the first-half of the term in the PCEO and in the second-half in the Degree in Law. The area of Constitutional Law will teach he lessons 3 and 4; 7-10 and 14; that will be delivered during the second-half of the term in the PCEO and in the first-halfa in the Degree in Law. Regarding the three first weeks of the term in the Degree in Law and the two first weeks of the PCEO, devoted  to intensive theoretical classes, they will be delivered in the first place by the Area of Public International Law and then by the Area of Constitutional Law in the PCEO, and the other way round in the Degree in Law. 

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ATTENDEES. FIRST OPPORTUNITY OF EVALUATION.

On the first day of class, students will be given an evaluation option sheet, in which they must choose between the continuous assessment system or the final evaluation system. They must return the fulfilled evaluation option sheet back to the professor in the next week. Within the continuous evaluation system, in the first opportunity of evaluation, they will not be able to go to the modality of final evaluation. Students who choose continuous assessment will do the different evaluation activites described in the evaluation section throughout the course, that is: two tests, two works, as well as the resolution of practical cases. With these evaluation activities they can reach up to a maximum of six points (three points in relation with each area of knowledge).

In addition, the student will take a final exam that will be held on the date scheduled in the exam calendar of the faculty and which will be evaluated up to a maximum of 4 points (2 ponts in relation with each area of knowledge). The qualification of the continuous evaluation activities will only be added if the students pass the 2 parts of the final exam.

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR NON ATTENDEES. FIRST OPPORTUNIY OF EVALUATION

Those students who do not follow the continuous evaluation, will be examined throught the final evaluation modality, which will consist of two parts: a written exam with 4 questions of development (2 from each area of knowlege) as well as the resolution of 4 practical cases (2 from each area of knowledge). The written test will be graded up to a maximum of 8 points (4 points each part) and the resolution of the practical case up to a maximum of two (1 point each part). The mark of the resolution of the practical case will only be added to that of the written exam as long as the students pass the 2 parts of the final theoretical exam. In any case, the competences and learning outcomes evaluated will be the same as in the system of evaluation for attendees.

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR 2nd OPPORTUNITY AND END OF CAREER EVALUATIONS

1.Students who, opting for the continuous evaluation system do not pass the subject at the first opportunity, will keep the grade they obtained in the continuous evaluation when taking the second opportunity (June exam and, if applicable, following academic year), previous petition to the professor, and having to do exclusively the theoretical part of the exam that will consist, as in the first opportunity, in questions to develop.

2. For those students who do not follow the continuous evaluation system, the evaluation system will be the one established in the Evaluation criteria for non-attendees in the first opportunity.

3. The exam corresponding to the End of Degree Call will be carried out in the same way as the final evaluation modality (evaluation criteria for non-attendees, first opportunity). 

The dates and times of the evaluation activities will be detailled in the exams calendar approved by the Board of the Faculty for the 2020-2021 academic year.