**POINT 1.
** SYSTEM OF AVALIACI*Ã�*N CONTINUOUS. DESCRICI*Ã�*N
The system of
*avaliaciÃ�*n by defect *Ã� the system of *avaliaciÃ�*n continuous. **1. 1. Envelope
** to subject
The subject
*PlanificaciÃ�*n and *xestiÃ�*n of advertising means *estÃ� *incluÃ�of the in the plan of
studies of the Degree in Advertising and *RelaciÃ�*ns *PÃ�*blicas how a subject of
*carÃ�*cter mandatory stop all the students and students that intend to achieve the
referred *tÃ�*tulo. This subject
*impÃ�*rtese in *rÃ�*xime PRESENCIAL pole that *Ã� owe of the students assist *Ã�*s
*sesiÃ�*ns @docente *prÃ�*cticas and *teÃ�rich in the time established pole centre. The assistance *Ã�
mandatory, so much *Ã� *teorÃ�it how *Ã�*s kinds *prÃ�*cticas. The students owe
to assist with regularity *Ã� subject (*mÃ�*nimo a 80% of the kinds), in the case of not
surpassing this figure, *perderÃ�*n the right to be evaluated **1.2. Envelope the scales of *avaliaciÃ�*n continuous of the subject **
The system of *avaliaciÃ�*n of the subject *realÃ�*zase attending the
three factors: It) Surpass the part *prÃ�*ctica, with the *realizaciÃ�*n of the
activities planned.All the students *teÃ�in it *obrigaciÃ�*n to go up all the
works of the course to platform *Moovi in the dates established. The dates of
delivery of the *prÃ�*cticas *serÃ�*n communicated with *antelaciÃ�*n sufficient of
verbal way in the classroom and the *travÃ�*s of *notificaciÃ�*ns to the post to *travÃ�*s of *Moovi. No it admits
LOW ANY CIRCUMSTANCE delivery of *prÃ�*cticas *fÃ�frog of term. The
delivery *fÃ�frog of term *supÃ�*n suspend this *prÃ�*ctica. *b) Surpass the part *teÃ�@rico, by means of an examination writing that
*realizarÃ� in the date pointed out pole centre. To surpass the part *prÃ�*ctica
*deberÃ�*n realized the activities planned in time and form and always low to
*supervisiÃ�*n teaching. These
activities will value envelope a *mÃ�*ximo of 10 points and *supoÃ�in a 60% of the
*avaliaciÃ�*n of the subject. *Ã� Necessary reach a *mÃ�*nimo of a 5 in the *prÃ�*cticas for
power do average. To surpass the
part *teÃ�@rico the students and students *deberÃ�*n surpass an examination individual writing
envelope the explained *teÃ�rich that impart in the classroom and that *estÃ�*n collected in the
program. The examination will value envelope a *mÃ�*ximo of 10 points and *supÃ�*n a 40% of the
*avaliaciÃ�*n of the subject. *Ã� Necessary reach a *mÃ�*nimo of a 4 in the examination for power
do average. ***c)
** Assistance and *participaciÃ�*n of the students in the kinds *teÃ�@rico and *prÃ�*cticas.
The assistance to
kind *Ã� a *condiciÃ�*n forced for power be evaluated. Those students or
students that do not assist *Ã�*s kinds *prÃ�*cticas *constarÃ�*n how SUSPENSO in the part
*prÃ�*ctica. Summary of
proofs and percentage of *valoraciÃ�*n global of the joint of tasks that involves this
proof *Â� Test 1 (*P1): Examination. *ValoraciÃ�*n Of 40% envelope the total of the note. *Â� Test 2 (*P2): Delivery of works
*prÃ�*cticos. *ValoraciÃ�*n Of 30% envelope the total of the note. *Â� Test 3 (*P3): *RealizaciÃ�*n of
*prÃ�*cticas in the classroom. *ValoraciÃ�*n Of 30% envelope the total of the note. *P1(40%) + *P2(30%) +*P3(30%) = 100% of the note **Requirements to surpass the subject:**
*Â· #Prpers had approved all the works *prÃ�*cticos *Â· Approve the examination *teÃ�@rico The final note *Ã� the result of the average of both notes
(no *farÃ� half with any of the parts *suspensa). **@IMPORTANTE**
Any content explained or *referenciado in kind
(*teorÃ�to & *prÃ�*ctica) *Ã� susceptible to be subject of examination. To approve the subject there is that approve all the *prÃ�*cticas
and the examination in all the *sÃ�the parts (test, development). **1.3. Envelope the control of assistance**
In all the *sesiÃ�*ns *prÃ�*cticas and of seminar will take
note of the members assistants (Leaf of signatures indicating name, identity card and sign). During all the semester so *sÃ� *serÃ� possible realize *DÃ�The
*XustificaciÃ�*ns of the fouls of assistance, that *deberÃ� be realized by means of it
*presentaciÃ�*n of the correspondent *xustificante *mÃ�*dico or labour. The *decisiÃ�*n of
*admisiÃ�*n of the even *dependerÃ� of the @docente and never *poderÃ� realized *mÃ�*is *alÃ�
of a week after the absence. The *prÃ�*cticas weekly are mandatory, *presenciais, and
will realize during *cÃ�*rsoo. In case to exist objective difficulties stop the
assistance, *serÃ� necessary communicated by writing and keep a *titorÃ�to
*presencial in the *dÃ�them (2) first weeks of the course. The present normative *Ã� applicable it all the students and
students enrolled in this subject WITHOUT EXCEPCI*Ã�*N @IMPORTANTE. That student/those that opt pole system of
*avaliaciÃ�*n global *deberÃ�*n follow the *pautas and *indicaciÃ�*ns that detail in the
POINT 3 of this *guÃ�it. **POINT 2. SECOND OPPORTUNITY. BRIEF DESCRICI*Ã�*N.**
That/The students that study *avaliaciÃ�*n continuous
*deberÃ�*n surpass in second announcement all those *metodoloxÃ�them or proofs
that did not surpass in first announcement. That/The
students that study *avaliaciÃ�*n global *deberÃ�*n subjected in 2*Â� announcement *Ã�*s
same *condiciÃ�*ns described in the *avaliaciÃ�*n global. To effects to
coordinate the second opportunity, the students *deberÃ� contact with the responsible
@docente of the memory, the one who *establecerÃ� *prÃ�bullets *pertinentes #well was in
*Moovi, or of form *presencial during it dates established and approved in Together
of Faculty. The *condiciÃ�*ns
of second opportunity described *aquÃ� *aplÃ�*canse stop the rest of successive
announcements. **POINT 3.
** SYSTEM OF AVALIACI*Ã�*N GLOBAL. DESCRICI*Ã�*N
The system of
*avaliaciÃ�*n by defect of the University of Vigo *Ã� the system of *avaliaciÃ�*n
continuous. Those students that opt pole system of *avaliaciÃ�*n global *deberÃ�*n
follow the following *pautas. ***Pautas Formal **__indispensable__ previous *Ã�
*avaliaciÃ�*n:
The students *deberÃ� inform the @docente of the *sÃ�renounces it
expresses to the system of *avaliaciÃ�*n continuous in the term established pole centre stop
such end, attaching covered and signed the document enabled stop such end. ***Pautas The *dÃ�it of the *avaliaciÃ�*n:**
The proof of *avaliaciÃ�*n global will realize in the date and
due schedules pole centre in the calendar of official examinations and *avaliarÃ� of
form *sistemÃ�*tica all the *metodoloxÃ�them and proofs established in the *guÃ�to @docente.
The student *deberÃ� surpass all and #each of the proofs of *avaliaciÃ�*n due
that detail to *continuaciÃ�*n obtaining a *cualificaciÃ�*n *mÃ�*nima of 5 points in
#each of them. Given to *extensiÃ�*n of the proofs the students that receive the
*avaliaciÃ�*n global *deberÃ� *dispoÃ�*er of 5 hours (rests no *incluÃ�of the) stop to
*realizaciÃ�*n of the same from the official hour of start of the examination of the second
subject the official calendar. The student/for *deberÃ� surpass all and #each of the
following proofs of *avaliaciÃ�*n that the *continuaciÃ�*n detail with a *cualificaciÃ�*n
*mÃ�*nima of 5. **Brief
** *descriciÃ�*n and percentage of *valoraciÃ�*n of the proofs:
PROOF 1: Them/the
students that *efectÃ�in it *avaliaciÃ�*n global *realizarÃ�*n the same examination of
objective questions that the students that study *avaliaciÃ�*n continuous. Even
*dÃ�it, even time, same *pautas. The examination, in all the *sÃ�the parts, has a weight
of a 40% envelope the total of the note. There Is that obtain a *cualificaciÃ�*n *mÃ�*nima of 5
in all the *sÃ�the parts to approve this part. With less of 5 no it does
average, *aÃ�*nda that the rest of proofs are approved. PROOF 2. It owes
to do delivery the *dÃ�it of the official date of examination of two (2) works exposed
pole professor. The group of works exposed has a weight of a 30% envelope the
total of the note. There Is that obtain a *cualificaciÃ�*n *mÃ�*nima of 5 in each work
to approve this part. With less of 5 no it does average, *aÃ�*nda that the another work
was approved. The detail of the proofs, the form of delivery, the tasks to
realize and the criteria of *avaliaciÃ�*n will receive the student in one document ad hoc explanatory in the platform *Moovi. PROOF 3. After finishing the examination, and fulfilled the
*perÃ�*odos of rest between proofs that marks the normative, the student/for *asistirÃ�
*acompaÃ�*ado of the professor of the subject *preferiblemente *Ã� classroom in the that imparted
the kinds *prÃ�*cticas. The student/for *deberÃ� realize a *selecciÃ�*n of *prÃ�*cticas
realized and explained pole professor in the classroom along the *avaliaciÃ�*n continuous.
Of not being *dispoÃ�*ible this space, will realize or well in the classroom of examination or well
in the space that the centre *teÃ�to *dispoÃ�*ible. The proof *durarÃ� a *mÃ�*ximo of *dÃ�the hours
from the moment of start of the same. The detail of the tasks to realize, the
terms and the criteria of *avaliaciÃ�*n *explicarÃ�*selle to the student/it in the classroom. Stop
to *realizaciÃ�*n of the part *prÃ�*ctica no *Ã� possible employ the personal teams of the
students neither consult the *documentaciÃ�*n of the subject in *Moovi. Any of the
*violaciÃ�*ns of these *condiciÃ�*ns *anularÃ� the proof to realize. This proof, together,
has a weight of a 30% envelope the total of the note. There Is that obtain a *cualificaciÃ�*n
*mÃ�*nima of 5 in #each of the tasks exposed to approve this
part. With less of 5 no it does average, *aÃ�*nda that the rest of proofs are
approved. Summary of proofs and percentage of *valoraciÃ�*n global of the
joint of tasks that involves this proof *Â� Test 1
(*P1): Examination. *ValoraciÃ�*n Of 40% envelope the total of the note. *Â� Test 2 (*P2): Delivery of works
*prÃ�*cticos. *ValoraciÃ�*n Of 30% envelope the total of the note. *Â� Test 3 (*P3): *RealizaciÃ�*n of
*prÃ�*cticas in the classroom. *ValoraciÃ�*n Of 30% envelope the total of the note. *P1(40%) + *P2(30%) +*P3(30%) = 100% of the note *InsÃ�*stese #Afresh in that, to approve the subject, *Ã�
indispensable approve in time and #be it to me all the proofs (1,2 and 3). With an inferior
note to 5 in any of the proofs, no does half *aÃ�*nda that the rest of
proofs are approved. Therefore, the/the student/for *deberÃ� obtain a *cualificaciÃ�*n
*mÃ�*nima of 5 in all the proofs to approve. **Other aspects to consider**
The *informaciÃ�*n envelope the proofs of *avaliaciÃ�*n, his
format, *extensiÃ�*n, *rÃ�*brica of *avaliaciÃ�*n and channels of delivery *serÃ�*n detailed
to *travÃ�*s of the platform *Moovi. *Ã� Responsibility of the student or student be
attentive *Ã� *informaciÃ�*n rise and recompile the *informaciÃ�*n *especÃ�stays and
complementary that was accurate to surpass the subject. The material stop the study of the subject *serÃ�*n the @subir
*Moovi and the notes of the *sesiÃ�*ns imparted in the classroom, so much in *sesiÃ�*ns
*teÃ�rich how *prÃ�*cticas. *Ã� Responsibility of the student/to be attentive *Ã�
*informaciÃ�*n @subir *Moovi and recompile the notes and *documentaciÃ�*n no @subir# a *Moovi that are object of examination and/the explanatory of the distinct
proofs of *avaliaciÃ�*n. The *guÃ�to @docente presents the *formulaciÃ�*n general of the subject.
By reasons of *extensiÃ�*n and in front of the impossibility to go up *documentaciÃ�*n
complementary in the platform *Docnet, the details *mÃ�*is concrete envelope the system
of *avaliaciÃ�*n global will manage in time and form to *travÃ�*s of the platform
*Moovi. Stop all the no contemplated and/the detailed of
form expresses in this *guÃ�it, will take how reference the *indicaciÃ�*ns of the Regulation
envelope to *avaliaciÃ�*n, to *cualificaciÃ�*n and the quality *dÃ� *docencia and of the process of
learning of the *estudantado (Approved no cloister of the 18 of April of 2023).
*DispoÃ�*ible In: https://secretary.*uvigo.*gal/*uv/Normative/web/*public/*show/565 |