Guia docente 2023_24 Facultade de Historia

Assessment

	Description	Qualification	Training and Learning Results
Studies excursion	The field trip will be evaluated counting the attendance and the submision of a brief report. The evaluated learning results are: "Analysis and assessment of the concepts learned by the use of the sources and the historical interpretation" and "Critical analysis of the historiographic traditions about controversial or general interest subjects"	10	A3	B6	C18	D7
Presentation	The contents covered in the semminars will be evaluated by means of the presentations/expositions of the students, as lectures about a specific choosen subtheme. We will evaluate the contents and methodology of the presentation, as well as the submission of its written notes. The evaluated learning results are: "Elaboration and presentation, oral and written, of a monographic work, individually or in group, based in the sources and specific bibliographic references"	15	A4	B3	C18	D9
Seminars	The contents covered in the semminars will be evaluated by means of the presentations/expositions of the students, as lectures about a specific choosen subtheme. We will evaluate the contents and methodology of the presentation, as well as the submission of its written notes. The evaluated learning results are: "Elaboration and presentation, oral and written, of a monographic work, individually or in group, based in the sources and specific bibliographic references"	25	A4	B3	C18	D9
Objective questions exam	The contents covered in the professor's lectures and the students' presentations will be evaluated by a written exam with short answers (multiple choice questions). There will be two mid-term exams, besides a final exame in each academic sitting. The evaluated learning results are: "Analysis and assessment of the concepts learned by the use of the sources and the historical interpretation" and "Critical analysis of the historiographic traditions about controversial or general interest subjects"	40	A1	B3	C23	D2 D5
Systematic observation	Active participation in the theoretical and practical classes, both in the on-site and the virtual modality (through the virtual teaching platform MooVi). The evaluated learning results are: "Analysis and assessment of the concepts learned by the use of the sources and the historical interpretation" and "Critical analysis of the historiographic traditions about controversial or general interest subjects	10			C23	D5 D7

Other comments on the Evaluation
The students who choose the virtual or distance mode can follow the subject through the “Curso Virtual” in the virtual teaching platform Moodle, from the University of Vigo. Here they can access to the necessary materials to acquire the competences and achieve the learning results, both in the theoretical and practical contents. The teaching methodologies and the evaluation activities will be specified, as well as the submission calendar (on-site lesson and distance learning). Activities that require the presence of the student will be replaced by others that allow to achieve the same grade percentage. The individual progress of the student involvement through the ITC will be done by means of the platform tools (involvement, access statistics, fulfil online tests and exercises, etc.). The use of the materials available via Moovi by the students must respect the copyright regulations and those test or exams that “copy in essence the works from others, rendering them as their own” (DLE-RAE) will be graded with a zero (the lowest grade). All the lectures from the professor and the practical lessons (when possible) will be recorded. The recordings will be available for the students in the platform MooVi, where they can watch them whenever they consider it appropriate. The student must fulfil the minimum assistance requirements to benefit from the continuous evaluation. Besides they must attend the tests that the professor considers necessary. The attendance to the theoretical and practical lessons will be quantified (10%), either on-site in the classroom or in the virtual recordings of the lessons in MooVi. To pass the subject (and have a weighted average with the evaluation of the practical exercises) it is necessary to obtain a grade equal or higher than 4 in the exam (mid-term exams or final exam). Besides it is necessary to submit a significant enough part of the practical activities, to obtain a grad equal or higher than 3. The same conditions apply for the second examination sitting. The evaluation of the field trio (10% in the final grade): the attendance to the trip is enough to pass the activity (5 points). The other half of the grade (5 points) will rely in the submission and evaluation of a review about the visited archaeological sited. For those students that do NOT participate in the trip: the submission and evaluation (10 points) of a review about an ON-SITE alternative trip (minimum 2 relevant archaeological sites of their choice) Beside the continuous evaluation, the general norm for the on-site and virtual students, all the students can opt to be evaluated via a “global evaluation” mode. The choice must be communicated to the professor of the subject within 31 days from the beginning of the term (art 19.4 del Regulamento sobre a avaliación, a calificación e a calidade da docencia e do proceso de aprendizaxe do estudantado, de la Universidad de Vigo). The global evaluation test will be done by means of: - A traditional written exam (short questions + explanation of a topic to choose between two). Weight of a 50% from the total grade. The student must achieve in a grade equal or higher than 4 to be averaged with the practical part. - Submission of a written bibliographic work about a subject related to Roman or Greek archaeology, agreed with the professor, with a minimum extent of 20 pages and a maximum of 30 pages, including the graphic materials (maps, plans, photos, drawings) inserted in the text, and references. It is mandatory to consult and reference at least 5 specific bibliographic refrences about the selected site or subject. The weight of the work is a 50% of the final grad. The work must be grade equal or higher than 3 to be averaged with the exam. The final grade will be the arithmetic mean between the exam and the work. The global evaluation tests will rule both in the ordinary sitting of June and the extraordinary sitting of July.