Objective questions exam |
Tests that evaluate knowledge that include questions closed with different response alternatives (true/false, multiple choice, matching of elements...). The students choose an answer from a limited number of possibilities (preferably four) with a reduction for failure equal to success probability (-0.25 pts. in the case of four possible
answers, if the value of the question is 1 pt). The test of objective questions only evaluates knowledge. Does not assess skills and attitudes. Assesses thinking skills inferior, knowledge, understanding and application. |
20 |
A1 A2 A3
|
B2 B6 B7
|
C25 C26
|
|
Systematic observation |
Careful, rational, planned and systematic perception to describe and record the manifestations of student behaviour. It is possible to assess learning and actions and how they are carried out by evaluating order, precision, skill, efficiency... The aim is to evaluate higher thinking. |
30 |
A1 A2 A3 A4
|
B1 B3 B4
|
C26
|
D1 D2 D3
|
Students who do not pass the subject in continuous training at the first opportunity of each academic year, in which the distribution of evaluation weights is as stablished above, will have the possibility of having an exam of objective questions, worth 100% of the final mark, in successive calls that are not the first opportunity of each academic year. Ethical commitment: Students are expected to behave ethically. If unethical behaviour is detected (copying, plagiarism, use of unauthorised electronic devices,...), the student will be considered to be no apt to pass the subject. Depending on the type of unethical behaviour detected, it could be concluded that the student has not reached the necessary skills to overcome the subject. Students are expected to behave in a respectful and dignified manner and to collaborate with the teaching system, teaching staff, the coordination and the administrative and services personnel of the Master's degree. Any question due to the lack of ethical and dignified behaviour of the student body may have repercussions on the evaluation of the subject. |