Educational guide 2024_25 Centro Universitario da Defensa da Escola Naval Militar de Marín

Master Universitario en Dirección TIC para la defensa

Systems engineering and ICT project management

Assessment

	Description	Qualification	Training and Learning Results
Presentation	Presentation by the students, individually or in groups, of a topic related to the contents of the subject or of the results of a work, exercise, project, etc. A presentation (P) will be given and assessed during the face-to-face phase: activity P will cover topics 2, 4 and 6 of the subject. Knowledge, skills and attitudes can be assessed by means the presentation.	20	A9 A10	B4	C4	D4 D5
Discussion Forum	An activity carried out in a virtual environment in which a variety of current topics related to the academic and/or professional sphere are debated. It assesses the skills, knowledge and, to a lesser extent, attitudes of the student. A discussion or debate activity (D) will be carried out in a virtual environment and will be assessed during the distance phase: activity D will cover all the topics of the subject.	10	A8	B5	C4	D5
Objective questions exam	Test that assesses knowledge and includes closed questions with different answer alternatives (true or false, multiple choice, item matching, etc.). There will be a written test (PE) at the end of the face-to-face phase, in which all the topics and contents of the subject will be evaluated (including the contents of the distance and face-to-face phases).	60	A6	B2	C4	D4 D5
Essay	A text or document on a topic which must be written according to established rules of style and length. It allows the assessment of the student's skills, knowledge and, to a lesser extent, attitudes. A report (T) will be produced and assessed during the distance learning phase: the T activity covers topics 1, 4 and 5 of the subject.	10	A9 A10	B4	C4	D4 D5

Other comments on the Evaluation
If we call the average mark for continuous assessment MED_CON, which is calculated as follows: MED_CON = 0.2P + 0.1 D + 0.1T + 0.3PE1 +0.3PE2 It will be necessary to obtain at least 50% of the grade to pass the subject. If the subject is not passed in the ordinary call, there will be a second opportunity to pass it in the extraordinary call, which will be held in distance mode on the dates established for this purpose by the Master's Academic Committee. The evaluation process in this second call would be carried out by means of a single written test for 100% of the grade, being necessary to obtain at least 50% of the grade to pass the subject. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY:* Students are expected to show adequate ethical behaviour, committing to act honestly. Based on article 42.1 of the Regulation on the evaluation, qualification and quality of teaching and the student learning process of the University of Vigo, any violation of academic integrity in the assessment process, as well as the cooperation in it will result in the assignment of a failing grade to the student (zero) for the entire course in the corresponding assessment opportunity, regardless of the percentage of importance that the test in question had in the overall continuous assessment, and independently of other disciplinary actions that may be applied. In the academic activities and assignments of this course, the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) tools is allowed, used in an ethical, critical and responsible manner. In case you have used GAI, you should critically evaluate any results it provides, carefully verify any citations or references generated, and declare the use of these tools. It is not necessary to disclosure the use of GAI in tasks that do not produce content (proofreading language - spelling or grammar - in a document, translating text, obtaining suggestions to reorganize content or modify the style of a document, or to adapt the format of bibliographic references). AI-generated content (text, images, etc.) must be disclosured and correctly referenced, providing, at least, the following elements: generated content, prompt used in the query, tool used, version, company authoring the software, date on which the query was made and the link to the tool's website. The detection of situations involving non-disclosure of GAI will be considered academic fraud and the measures described in the previous paragraph will be applied. In the case of any difference between the Galician/Spanish/English guides related to the evaluation, the Spanish guide will always prevail.