Project |
Project report and defence by means of oral presentation. |
30 |
|
B1 B2
|
C18
|
D2 D3 D5 D7 D8 D9 D10 D12 D14 D15 D17 D20
|
The final evaluation will be the sum of the punctuation awarded to each one of the before commented parts, being the Note of Final Continuous Evaluation (FCE): FCE = 0,6 * THEORY + 0,3 * PROJECT + 0,1 * QUESTIONNAIRE In addition to reaching a final qualification of at least 5 points on 10 (FCE ≥ 5), to surpass the matter by continuous evaluation there will be demanded some minimum requirements, that guarantee the balance between all the types of skills. These requirements are the following: - To obtain a note of at least 4 points on 10 in the continuous evaluation final exam (PF).
In case of not surpassing the matter by continuous evaluation, the students will have to attend the ordinary examination of first call. Likewise, in the particular supposition of not to fulfil the minimum requirements established, the qualification of the continuous evaluation will be calculated as follows: FCE FINAL = min (4, FCE). On the other hand, the students that surpass the matter by continuous evaluation will be able to attend to the ordinary examination of first call to improve their qualification. Both, in the ordinary examination of first call and the extraordinary (second call), will be evaluated all the skills of the course, including ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: Students are expected to show adequate ethical behaviour, committing to act honestly. Based on article 42.1 of the Regulation on the evaluation, qualification and quality of teaching and the student learning process of the University of Vigo, as well as point 6 of the fifth rule of Order DEF/711/2022, of July 18, which establishes the requirements for evaluation, progress, and ongoing enrolment in military educational training centres for incorporation into the ranks of the Armed Forces, any violation of academic integrity in the assessment process, as well as the cooperation in it will result in the assignment of a failing grade to the student (zero) for the entire course in the corresponding assessment opportunity, regardless of the percentage of importance that the test in question had in the overall continuous assessment, and independently of other disciplinary actions that may be applied. In the academic activities and assignments of this course, the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) tools is allowed, used in an ethical, critical and responsible manner. In case you have used GAI, you should critically evaluate any results it provides, carefully verify any citations or references generated, and declare the use of these tools. It is not necessary to disclosure the use of GAI in tasks that do not produce content (proofreading language - spelling or grammar - in a document, translating text, obtaining suggestions to reorganize content or modify the style of a document, or to adapt the format of bibliographic references). AI-generated content (text, images, etc.) must be disclosured and correctly referenced, providing, at least, the following elements: generated content, prompt used in the query, tool used, version, company authoring the software, date on which the query was made and the link to the tool's website. The detection of situations involving non-disclosure of GAI will be considered academic fraud and the measures described in the previous paragraph will be applied. |