Guia docente 2023_24
Centro Universitario de la Defensa de la Escuela Naval Militar de Marín
Master Universitario en Dirección TIC para la defensa
 Subjects
  Satellite communication systems, positioning, remote sensing and radionavigation
   Assessment
  Description Qualification Training and Learning Results
Self-assessment Mechanism in which, by means of a series of questions or activities, the learner is activities, it is possible for the student to evaluate autonomously his or her autonomously their degree of acquisition of knowledge and skills about the the subject, allowing a self-regulation of the personal learning process. personal learning process.
There will be two intermediate tests (PE1 and PE2), one hour long, to control the follow-up of the subject. Each test of control has a weight of 20%. The first test that covers topics 1 and 2 will be carried out in the distance phase, while the second test that will cover topics 3 and 4 will be carried out in the face-to-face phase.
40 A6
A7
A8
A9
B1
B2
B5
C12
C13
D4
Presentation Presentation by the students, individually or in groups, of a work (T1 and T2) related to the contents of the topic 1 and 2 of the subject . Each task has a weight of 10% and will be evaluated in the distance phase. 20 A6
A7
A8
A9
A10
B1
B2
B5
C12
C13
D4
D5
Problem and/or exercise solving Resolution of different exercises (E1 and E2) proposed in class on assumptions applicable to each of the topics 3 and 4 of the syllabus. Each exercise has a weight of 10% and will be carried out in the distance phase. 20 A6
A7
A8
A9
A10
B1
B2
B5
C12
C13
D4
D5
Laboratory practice Evaluation of two laboratory practices (PL1 and PL2) related to the course syllabus by means of deliverable reports that will be carried out in the face-to-face phase. Each practice has a weight of 10%. 20 A6
A7
A8
A9
A10
B1
B2
B5
C12
C13
D4
D5
 
Other comments on the Evaluation

If the average grade of continuous assessment, called MED_CON, is calculated as:

MED_CON=0.4*(PE1+PE2)/2+0.2*(T1+T2)/2+0.2*(E1+E2)/2+0.2*(PL1+PL2)/2

it will be necessary to obtain at least 50% of the grade to pass the course.

In case of not passing the course in the ordinary call, there would be a second opportunity to pass it in the extraordinary call, which would be carried out in distance mode on the dates established for this purpose by the Academic Committee of the Master. The evaluation of the second call will be carried out in distance mode, through the evaluation of a deliverable (work) which will account for 60% of the grade and the completion of a written test (with development questions and / or test type) using telematic means, which will account for the remaining 40%. It will be necessary to obtain at least 50% of the grade to pass the course. The evaluation process in this second call would be carried out as indicated in the following table

Assessment systems

Denomination

Qualification(%)

Competences

Evaluation of deliverables (work)

60%

CB6, CB7, CB8, CB9, CB10

CG1,CG2, CG5
CE12,CE13
CT4, CT5
Written test

40%

CB6, CB7, CB8, CB9, CB10

CG1,CG2, CG5 CE12,CE13
CT4, CT5

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: 

Students are expected to show adequate ethical behaviour, committing to act honestly. Based on article 42.1 of the Regulation on the evaluation, qualification and quality of teaching and the student learning process of the University of Vigo, any
violation of academic integrity in the assessment process, as well as
the cooperation in it will result in the assignment of a failing grade
to the student (zero) for the entire course in the corresponding
assessment opportunity
, regardless of the percentage of importance
that the test in question had in the overall continuous assessment and
independently of other disciplinary actions that may be applied.

In the event that there is any difference between the Galician/Spanish/English guides related to evaluation the Spanish guide will always prevail.

Universidade de Vigo            | Rectorado | Campus Universitario | C.P. 36.310 Vigo (Pontevedra) | España | Tlf: +34 986 812 000