| Case studies |
Methodology where the subject confronts in front of the description of a specific situation that poses a problem that has to
be comprised, valued and resolved by a group of people, through a process of discussion. The student situates in front of
a concrete problem (case), that describes him a real situation of the professional life, and has to be able to analyse a series
of facts, referents to a particular area of the knowledge or of the action, to arrive to a decision reasoned through
a process of discussion in small groups of work. |
30 |
|
|
|
|
| Mentored work |
Methodologie Designed to promote the autonomous learning of the students, under the *tutela of the professor and in stages
varied (academic and professionals). It is referred to the learning of the ?How do the things?. It constitutes
an option based in the assumption by the students of the responsibility by his own learning |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.- FACE-TO-FACE MODALITY
The punctuation of the submodules is the following:
Management of the Human Resources 40 % Management of the communications and parts interested 60 % 1.1.- Model of continuous evaluation:
Management of the Human Resources will control the assistance to class and the active participation in the debates and the study that pose . Those
people that are missing to class will not have the punctuation of the practical cases made in the same. Equally it will pose to the students the
need to make a work like proof *liberatoria of the module. Management of the communications: Participation (face-to-face Assistance or
compensated) to the three sessions Work of classroom: study of cases and activities made in the class. (35%) Optional: Presentation of the
exercises corrected with the conclusions of each case following the procedure of presentation of the work (10%) Assessment of the matter, of the
professor and of the learning of the student of argued and constructive form (15%). Lacking compensation of assistances: Management of the
communications: In the cases that produce absence to any face-to-face interactive session, in addition to the complete presentation of the dossier
of exercises will have to make the following additional activities that will have to deliver in the term of a month after the ending of the
last session of the matter: 1 fault of assistance: Design of an objective proof of evaluation of 10 questions following the available guidelines in
the virtual platform. 2 faults of assistance: Design of an objective proof of evaluation of 30 questions following the available guidelines in
the virtual platform. 3 faults of assistance: Review and defence on some works related with the matter following the available guidelines in
the virtual platform Procedure of presentation of the works of evaluation: Management of Human Resources: The work will deliver by email
in the date indicated by the professor in class. Management of the communications and parts interested: they will present digitally the exercises
resolved made in class Denomination of the archive: Work of classroom: *MDIP12021 To072 Surnames and appoint Works corrected (optional):
*MDIP2021 To072 Corrections Surnames and appoint autonomous Evaluation (optional): *MDIP2021 To072 *AutoEval Surnames and name Delivers:
By means of platform *Moodle *UDC Term of delivery: Three weeks after the ending of the last session of the matter. 1.2.- Model final Examination:
Management of the *RRHH: (40%) The people that do not surpass the requirements of quality of the works or do not present them, will have to make the tasks
entrusted by the *profesorado in addition to an objective proof on the management of the *RRHH in the official announcement of examination. Management of the
communications and parts interested: (60%) The people that do not surpass the requirements of quality of the works or that deliver out of term
the contents of the evaluation, will have to make the tasks entrusted by the *profesorado in addition to an objective proof on the management of the
communications and parts interested in the official announcement of examination. 2.- MODALITY on line. The punctuation of the submodules is
the following: Management of the Human Resources 40 % Management of the communications and parts interested 60 % 2.1.- Model of continuous
evaluation: to) Preparation, delivery and/or correct exhibition of the final work that reflect the command of the matter (70%)Management of the Human
Resources: continuous Evaluation by means of the participation in the virtual surroundings and/or the delivery of exercises / problems / *comprobaciones periodic
(35%)Management of the Communications and of the Parts Interested: Presentation of the *dossiers of exercises with the conclusions of each case
following the procedure of presentation of the works (25%)Assessment of the matter, of the *profesorado and of the learning of the student of
argued and constructive form (10%).b) Objective proof: To evaluate the understanding of the content of the matter (30%) 2.2. Model final
Examination: Management of the *RRHH: (40%) The people that do not surpass the requirements of quality of the works or do not present them, will have to make the
tasks entrusted by the *profesorado in addition to an objective proof on the management of the *RRHH in the official announcement of examination. Management
of the communications and parts interested: (60%) The people that do not surpass the requirements of quality of the works or that deliver out of
term the contents of the evaluation, will have to make the tasks entrusted by the *profesorado in addition to an objective proof on the management
of the communications and parts interested in the official announcement of examination. |
