| Projects |
A portion of the final grade will be based on:
1. Advisors recommendations. For an adequate tracking of the project development, advisors will request different pieces of evidence, both oral and/or written, including partial and/or final reports. Each pair of advisors must submit a justified recommendation to the committee as to the team work methodology and the performance of the team members in the accomplishment of the project goals. Competences CG1, CG4, CG6, CG7, CG8, CG11, CG12, CE54, CE55, CE56, CE57 will be evaluated here.
2. Group mates. A peer review among the team members will be also requested as additional evidence for competences CG9, CT1, CT4. |
65 |
|
B1
B4
B6
B7
B8
B9
B11
B12
|
C54
C55
C56
C57
|
D1
D4
|
| Presentations / exhibitions |
A portion of the final grade will be based on the committee evaluation during the LPRO DAYS. The attendance to these days will be mandatory for all students. They must submit an executive summary of the project at least three days in advance to help assess their work. This part of the assessment will be made taking into account the summary of the project, the presentation, the poster and the work performed during the LPRO DAYS. The members of the evaluation committee will be the instructors of the Type-A ECTS, as long as they are not involved in the supervision of any project. Otherwise, additional assistance for the evaluation of those conflicting projects will be requested from other instructors from the course. Although the grade is expected to be similar for the entire group as a general principle, exceptions might apply. Thus, especially underperforming students not contributing to the team effort can get a different grade. Similarly, students contributing well above the average of the group can get a higher grade. |
35 |
|
B1
B7
B9
B12
|
|
D2
|
|
It is mandatory the attendance to the 80% of the face to face sessions during the term, both in type-A and Type-C academic activities. Final presentations are allowed in Galician, Spanish or English. In any case, those students that decide to take the course in English should participate always in the English activities. Those teams not getting the minimum grade to pass the course will have some additional weeks till the allocated date in the second call to present their work again. If the performance of a given student is graded differently from his/her team-mates, and this leads to failing the course, then he/she will need to show a comprehensive domain of the project developed by his/her team in the second call, together with sufficient additional contributions of his/her own. |
