Educational guide 2016_17
Facultade de Química
Grao en Química
 Subjects
  Pharmaceutical chemistry
   Assessment
  Description Qualification Training and Learning Results
Master Session They will evaluate the contents developed in the *temario (subjects 1-6 ) by means of questions that will pose *verbalmente or by writing in the classroom. The questions that formulate by writing will be referents to the contents treated in the two or three previous weeks. 7 A1
A3
C19
C23
D14
D15
D16
Seminars It will value the assistance and the participation in the classes, the resolution of exercises and questions, the presentation and exhibition of reports, of summaries and of works 23 A1
A3
A4
A5
C19
C20
C22
C23
D1
D3
D4
D5
D7
D8
D9
D10
D12
D13
D14
D16
Outdoor study / field practices It will value the assistance and active participation in the visit, and the result obtained in the realisation of a questionnaire on the same. 10 A3
C20
D14
D15
D17
Short answer tests *relizarán 2 short proofs, of 1 *h of length. The first in the week 6 and in her will go in the contended of the *temario explained until this moment. The second when finalising the subject 7 and in her will go in exclusively the contended of the subject 7. 30 A1
A3
A5
C19
C20
D7
D12
D13
D14
Long answer tests and development Finalised the 6 first subjects will realise a global proof to evaluate the competitions purchased. It is indispensable requirement to surpass the matter reach a minimum of 50% in the proofs written. 30 A1
A3
A5
C19
C20
D7
D12
D13
D14
 
Other comments on the Evaluation
<*p>The participation of the *alumnado in any of the acts of *evluación of the matter will involve the condition of presented and therefore the allocation of a qualification. They consider acts of evaluation the assistance to seminars (4 or but), as well as the realisation any of the 3 proofs written. To be able to approve the matter the student has to have a note *mínina in some of the distinct sections in which *desglosa the evaluation. This minimum note has to be of 3,5 in the second proof of short answer, and of 4 in the proof of long answer,&*nbsp; in the assessment of the seminars and in the assessment of the exit of studies.</*p><*p>Evaluation of the announcement of July</*p><*p>1. Punctuation obtained by the students/ace during the course: maximum 4 points</*p><*p>will conserve the punctuation *obtendida in&*nbsp; the questions *plantedas in the sessions *magistrales (maximum 0,7 points), in the activities related with the visit (maximum 1 point), and in participation in the seminars (maximum 2,3 points).</*p><*p>2. Work realised by the students: maximum 2 points </*p><*p>Finished the process of evaluation of June, the *profesorado will propose to the students/ace that have not surpassed the matter the realisation of an individual work that allow them purchase the competitions of which will be evaluated in July. This work will have to be delivered and defended by the students before the official examination of this announcement.&*nbsp; </*p><*p>Tests written</*p><*p>The students/ace will realise a proof written similar to the one of June in which they will be able to obtain a maximum of 4 points</*p>
Universidade de Vigo            | Reitoría | Campus Universitario | C.P. 36.310 Vigo (Pontevedra) | Spain | Tlf: +34 986 812 000