Test in which students must solve a series of problems and/or exercises in a time/conditions established by the teacher. In this way, students must apply the knowledge they have acquired.
Different tools can be used to apply this technique such as, for example, chat, mail, forum, audio conference, video conference, etc.
Problem solving evaluates knowledge and skills, but not attitudes.
15
A2
B2 B4 B7
C32
Project based learning
Presentation of a project by a group or individually
Objectives: To evaluate higher thinking. Analysis, synthesis and evaluation are valued.
The project evaluates knowledge, skills and attitudes.
20
A2 A3
B4 B7
C31 C32
D1 D2
Objective questions exam
Tests that evaluate knowledge that include closed questions with different answer alternatives (true/false, multiple choice, matching of elements...). Students select an answer from a limited number of possibilities (preferably four) with a reduction for failure of a value equal to the percentage of success (-0.25 pts. in the case of four possible answers if the value of the question is 1 pt).
The test of objective questions only evaluates knowledge. It does not evaluate skills or attitudes. It evaluates skills of inferior thinking. It assesses knowledge, understanding and application.
20
A2 A3
B7
C31
Presentation
Presentation by the students to the teacher and/or a group of students of an aspect on the contents of the subject or the results of a work, exercise, project... It can be carried out individually or in a group.
In the presentation, knowledge, skills and attitudes are evaluated.
The objective is to evaluate higher thinking (analysis and synthesis).
15
A2
B4
C31 C32
D1 D2
Systematic observation
Careful, rational, planned and systematic perception to describe and record the manifestations of student behaviour. It is possible to assess learning and actions and how they are carried out valuing order, precision, dexterity, efficiency... The aim is to evaluate higher thinking.
30
A2 A3
B2 B4 B7
C31 C32
D1 D2
Other comments on the Evaluation
Students who do not pass the subject in continuous training at the first opportunity of each academic year, in which the distribution of evaluation weights is as stablished above, will have the possibility of having an exam of objective questions, worth 100% of the final mark, in successive calls that are not the first opportunity of each academic year
Ethical commitment: Students are expected to
behave ethically. If unethical behaviour is detected (copying, plagiarism, use
of unauthorised electronic devices,...), the student will be considered to be
ineligible to pass the subject. Depending on the type of unethical behaviour
detected, it could be concluded that the student has not reached the necessary
skills to overcome the subject. Students are expected to behave in a respectful
and dignified manner and to collaborate with the teaching system, teaching
staff, coordination and administrative and services personnel of the Master's
degree. Any question due to the lack of ethical and dignified behaviour of the
student body may have repercussions on the evaluation of the subject.
