Rule 1: To pass the matter is indispensable requirement to have attended satisfactorily lab. This requires : a)  assisted to all the sessions of practices or present a certificate accrediting a justified reason ; and b) reach a 4.0 punctuation. When both requirements are not full filled the global qualification will not exceed 4.0 points.

Rule 2: Each examination (partial or final) will include theoretical questions and numerical problems. To surpass the examination, in addition to a global qualification of 5.0 points, it is necessary to obtain a minimum punctuation of 4.0 points on 10 in the theoretical questions and of 3.0 points on 10 in the numerical problems. In contrary case the global qualification of the examination could not exceed 4.0 points on 10.

Rule 3. The students that, fulfilling the "rule 2", reach an equal or upper punctuation to 4,2 on 10 points in the partial proof could go to the final examination (in any one of his opportunities) answering only the exercises and questions related with those subjects not reviewed in the partial examination. This option must be indicated to the professor when beginning the final examination. When using this option the global qualification of the examinations will be obtained valuing to 50% the partial and to 50% the final.

Rule 4. When previoius rules are fullfilled, the global qualification of the matter will be the highest of:  a) that obtained in the examination (or group of examinations using the rule 3);  and b) the resultant of applying the following weighting:  resolution of exercises 10%,  practices of laboratory 10%, examination/s 80%.

Rule 5. In future trials to pass this course the students that have surpassed lab could request a certificate with the mark obtained in this course. It will serve them to request to future professors the validation of the lab. Access to this validation will depend, obviously, of the rules followed by future professors and does not remain guaranted.

Rule 6. We will not certify that a partial has been passed. It is not contemplated to keep approved parts of the subject between different academic years.

Rule 7. Along the cualification process, teachers could ask any student, in a personal interview, to answer any questions that could  make correction more exact. This way could be employed in cases where exams are not easy to read, professor have doubts about original authorship of the examination or any other that could be solved with this method.

Rule 8. The detection of any kind of non-ethical behaviour during the exam (any kind of copy) will give rise to student expeled from exam and 0,0 result, appplied to this opportunity and the following ones within the academic year.