Guia docente 2023_24 Facultade de Belas Artes

Assessment

	Description	Qualification	Training and Learning Results
Lecturing	The evaluation of the command of the aims and of the contents extracts of the understanding that the students does explicit with his argumentations during the corrections and especially in the final presentation of results	20		B2	C1 C7 C33 C36 C39
Workshops	Presentations of the processes and results of the works developed in the workshop. Follow-up *individualizado of the processes and results obtained in coherence with the aims (complexity, coherence of the articulations, handle of devices and integration of the space contexts in each proposal).	30		B3	C5 C6 C19 C20 C27 C31 C45 C47
Mentored work	Follow-up individualizado of the processes and results obtained in coherence with the aims. Memories of documentation of the project. They are values to take into account: 1. Description and interest project; the coherence of the documentation with the work presented, the shortness, clarity in the descriptions, quality of the drawings, diagrams, photographies, animations, texts, etc. 2.la feasibility of the project. 3.la adecuación Of the project to the space chosen.	20			C19 C20 C27 C31 C32 C43 C44 C47
Introductory activities	Elaboración e presentacións dos procesos e resultados dos traballos 1 e 2 desenvolvidos no taller. Seguimento individualizado dos procesos e resultados obtidos en coherencia cos obxectivos (complexidade, coherencia das articulacións, manexo de dispositivos, integración dos contextos espaciais e comprensión do rol do espectador) en cada unha das propostas.	30

Other comments on the Evaluation
<p> Criteria of evaluation. Will take into account the following factors:<p>1. The implication of the students in the educational activities. 2. His capacity of handle of the contents. 3. The management of the materials and procedures used in the workshop. 4. His interest and efficiency to carry to the limit the reflections and the proposals chosen. 4. It will value especially the positive or negative incidence of his work in relation to the dynamics of the group. <p>The evaluation is continuous. At the end of the educational period each student will expose the documentation of the works made during the course.&nbsp;<p>For those members of the students that have 5 faults without justifying -whenever no concurran exceptional circumstances- and for which do not satisfy the aims along the course, foresees he corresponding examination to the extraordinary announcement of July and end of career. In this proof, will present all the works developed along the course as well as the presentation of a dossier in PDF with his documentation.