<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;><*b>7. SYSTEM OF EVALUATION

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;><*b>&*nbsp;

7.1. CRITERIA OF EVALUATION

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>

The method of evaluation of the subject , will make of continuous form under a work of follow-up in the classroom of the process of development of the personal works presented by each to student, and governs in base to the following criteria:

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>7.1.1. General criteria of evaluation

<*ul><*li>The artistic and functional interest of the works of design made. The student will have the option to establish a debate inside the group of the class in defence of the assessment of his work. In contrary case the professor will value this appearance unilaterally.

<*li>The understanding and correct utilisation of the technical and computer processes.

<*li>The capacity of experimentation and the curiosity researcher of the student.

<*li>The coherence or incoherence of all the exercises of the student.

<*li>The methodology and planning of the work. Work of reflection and previous study to the process of the preparation of a design.

<*li>The assistance to class and suitable attitude and interest in the classroom

<*li>The correct realisation of the works and proofs required in the subject in the terms stipulated.

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>7.1.2. Criteria of evaluation of the matter.

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>

Practical.

<*ul><*li>The formal coherence, aesthetic and conceptual of the elements used in the exercise and his *adecuación to the proposal.

<*li>The visual hierarchy and composition.

<*li>The correct formal preparation (digital and of impression) and his good presentation.

<*li>The creativity and originality in the approach of the exercise inside the specificity and the guidelines of the project as well as the interrelationships with the proposals of the Contemporary Design.&*nbsp;

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>Theorist

<*ul><*li>The enlargement of the knowledges given in class.

<*li>Understanding in depth of the concepts that have explained and the consistent clarity of expression of the same.

<*li>Capacity of analysis and of relation between different contents.

<*li>Correct use of the terminology and of the appointments.

<*li>Originality and rigour in the approach of the subject.

<*li>Good presentation of the exercises and works proposed.

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>To the hour to evaluate, differentiated clearly, the minimum contents whose *superación suppose the approve the matter and of which serve to establish punctuations higher.

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>It will not collect any work and therefore it will not be evaluated, those students(ace) that have not delivered previously &*nbsp;the index card of the matter with a recent photo.

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>7.2<*b>. Ordinary announcement of December

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>For the evaluation of the academic course in the announcement of December and like this approve by course, the *profesorado will demand the minimum presentation of a series of deliveries-corrections of the work of the course along the *cuatrimestre and that the student will have to surpass with a minimum qualification of “sufficient” in the dates stipulated. These deliveries-corrections will complete with the final delivery of the Global Personal Project.

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>DELIVERY OF WORKS: The student(to) will be forced to the deliveries-corrections of the work(*s) proposed(*s) by the professors during the academic course.&*nbsp;

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>PROOF *TEORICA-PRACTISES: In addition to said delivery, the professors reserve the option to make a theoretical proof and another practice in case to consider it necessary, consisting:

<*ul><*li>-&*nbsp;

&*nbsp;based in the specific contents of the programming. Only in the case that the student surpass this exercise will happen to make the following proof of practical character.

<*li>-&*nbsp;

, consistent in the realisation of a work based in the practices developed during the course. (Practical exercise in the computer, *Indesign and *Illustrator)

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>

<*ul><*li>

<*li>

<*div><*br />

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>7.3<*b>. Extraordinary announcement of Julio:

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>When the student(to) do not reach the level demanded or do not present to the normal announcements of evaluation of the course, articulates a system of “proofs of recovery”. Besides the student(to) will have of the extraordinary announcement of Julio.

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>DELIVERY OF WORKS: The student(to) will be forced to the deliveries-corrections of the work(*s) proposed(*s) by the professors during the academic course.&*nbsp;

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>PROOF *TEORICA-PRACTISES: In addition to said delivery, the professors reserve the option to make a theoretical proof and another practice in case to consider it necessary, consisting:

<*ul><*li>-&*nbsp;

&*nbsp;based in the specific contents of the programming. Only in the case that the student surpass this exercise will happen to make the following proof of practical character.

<*li>-&*nbsp;

, consistent in the realisation of a work based in the practices developed during the course.&*nbsp;(Practical exercise in the computer, *Indesign and *Illustrator)

<*p *class=&*quot;*MsoNormal&*quot;>

<*ul><*li>

<*li>

<*div><*br />

<*div><*div>Test of evaluation of extraordinary announcements

<*div>http://belasartes.uvigo.es/bbaa/index.php?id=79