The description of this guide this thought for the face-to-face modality.

The concretion of the activities to make will depend to a large extent of the number of students, means to work in group, etc

Two exclusionary itineraries are indicated for continous evaluation depending on whether the students participate in the ApS program or not (general students).

===General students===

The final mark will be the result of:

a) Realisation of several exercises/practical cases individual and/or in group. For the assesment, the lecturer will be able to demand an oral defence of the case (40%)

b) An exam when finalising the subject in which it will be measured the theoretical knowledges reached (60%)

c) It is necessary to reach a minimum of a 4.5 points out of 10 in each part to be able to compensate both marks and pass

===ApS students===

In the continuous evaluation the final mark will be the result of:
the) Realization of a learning folder/dossier and systematic observation by the lecturer. An oral defence may be required for the evaluation. This mark weights 40% in the final score as long as it is greater than or equal to 5 points out of 10.
(b) An exam at the end of the subject in which the theoretical knowledge achieved will be evaluated (60%)
c) It will be necessary to reach a minimum of 4.5 in the exam in order to compensate this mark with that of continuous evaluation and pass the subject.

===

Ordinary evaluation:

This process is for the students that do not follow the continuous evaluation or those that following it do not reach the minima established. In this case, the examination will consist in a proof in which they will pose theoretical questions and another in which there will be a practical case. To measure the skills of communication of the student can establish that one or the two proofs realise of oral form.

The dates and schedules of the proofs of evaluation of the different announcements are the specified in the calendar of proofs of evaluation approved by the Faculty.