Guia docente 2026_27 Facultad de Ciencias

Assessment

	Description	Qualification	Training and Learning Results
Mentored work	The justification of the work proposed and carried out by the students will be evaluated based on its applied interest, scientific-technological value, and novelty. The quality of the work will be assessed in terms of scientific rigor and formal structure. Creativity and innovation will also be evaluated. Additionally, the students' ability to identify critical points in their proposal and consider possible alternatives will be taken into account.	40	A1 A5	B1 B4	C2	D3
Practices through ICT	Active participation and the ability to resolve the issues raised will be evaluated.	5	A1 A5	B1 B4	C2	D1 D3
Case studies	The quality of the analysis of articles and/or the resolution of the proposed problems and cases will be evaluated based on their scientific rigor and the organization in the presentation of the results.	40	A1 A5	B1 B4	C2	D1
Oral exam	The students' ability to present the objective and justification of their supervised work proposal in an orderly, clear, and concise manner, as well as the rationale and development of the proposed process, and the difficulties and solutions posed, will be evaluated. Additionally, the ability to defend their proposal and constructively accept criticism during the debate following the presentation will be assessed.	15	A1 A5	B1 B4	C2	D1

Other comments on the Evaluation
Those students who, for a justified and duly documented cause, could not attend the planned in-person activities will proceed as follows: They will have to carry out individually all the activities planned in the "case study" activities They will have to present a report on a specific subject followed by a question time with the teacher that will be evaluated In the event of not being able to attend either the presentation session of the supervised works, this will be done on-line Face-to-face tutorial will change to remote mode with these students through email, Moovi platform, etc. Students who do not pass the subject in the corresponding quarter, will be able to opt for a second opportunity in the July call, fulfilling the same requirements as in the quarter evaluation. Any use of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic work must be disclosed, specifying the tool used, the purpose for which it was used, the extent of its contribution, and which parts of the work are the result of human authorship. Where there are reasonable grounds to suspect the improper use of AI, the teaching staff may reject the submission, request additional evidence, or refer the matter to the appropriate disciplinary administrative procedure.