Guia docente 2024_25 Centro Universitario de la Defensa de la Escuela Naval Militar de Marín

Assessment

	Description	Qualification	Training and Learning Results
Laboratory practical	The student will be evaluated of each laboratory practical (PL1 to PL7). This evaluation will be based on the laboratory reports or questionnaires with contents related to them. A possible situation could be that a single practical laboratory is evaluated by a report and a questonnary simultaneously. The submission of the reports and the completion of the questionnaires will be carried out electronically through the MooVi platform.	20		B3 B4	C14	D9 D10 D16 D17
Project based learning	Since the project has to be evaluated so that it is guaranteed the individual work as well as the positive interdependence (this is, all the members of the group must have worked and contributed to the final product and have to control all the aspects of the project), in the defence session, any member of the group must be able to answer to any question regarding the project. All of them must show, therefore, deep knowledge of the delivered product, independently of the part on which they had focused their efforts. The project defense will allow the lecturers to assess the degree of involvement in its development and the defense result will be a factor that will multiply the qualification corresponding to 10% of the project (except for the design) so that, if the group is not capable of answering the questions posed, this factor will be zero, nullifying the qualification obtained. On the contrary, if the group defends the submitted project well, said factor will be 1 and will consolidate its rating.	10		B3 B4	C14	D1 D2 D9 D10 D16 D17
Essay questions exam	The written exams (PF, PP1, PP2) aim to evaluate the learning of all the theoretical contents selected for the subject. Firstly, they will be made to judge what the student knows about the entire subject (PF), or a part of it (PP1, PP2). Secondly, the exam has to consist in a series of questions that make the conceptual and logical reasoning prevail, in order to verify the intellectual maturity of the students to obtain conclusions from the notions or the exposed theories in class. The final continuous assessment exam will be carried out during the evaluation week and will be valued out of 10 points. It will be necessary to obtain a grade greater than or equal to 4 points out of 10 in the final continuous assessment exam in order to qualify for a pass in the continuous assessment. There will be two partial continuous assessment tests (PP1 and PP2) during the course. Each control will account for 15% of the continuous assessment mark.	70		B3 B4	C14	D1 D2 D9 D16

Other comments on the Evaluation
The final mark by Continuous Assesment (NEC) will be the result of applying the weighted arithmetic mean of the mark of each of the parts (PF, PP, PL and TT): NEC = 0.40 · PF + 0.15 · PP1 + 0.15 · PP2 + 0.20 · PL + 0.10 · TT To pass the subject by Continuous Assessment, two conditions must be fulfil: having a NEC≥5 and a PF≥4. If the last condition is not met, the PL mark will be ignored, resulting in a fail grade in the Continuous Assessment of the subject, with a score equal to the minimum of 4.0 and the weighted average of PF and PT. Those students who do not pass the subject through the Continuous Assessment method must take the ordinary exam, where all the competencies of the subject will be evaluated. The results of this exam will account for 100% of the student's final mark, with a requirement to pass the subject obtaining a mark greater than or equal to 5. Finally, it is worth highlighting the option that every student has to raise their NEC. In other words, students who have passed the subject through Continuous Assessment will have the opportunity to take the ordinary exam to improve their grade. Students who have not passed the subject in the ordinary call will take an extraordinary exam that will have the same format and the same requirements as the ordinary exam. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: Students are expected to show adequate ethical behaviour, committing to act honestly. Based on article 42.1 of the Regulation on the evaluation, qualification and quality of teaching and the student learning process of the University of Vigo, as well as point 6 of the fifth rule of Order DEF/711/2022, of July 18, which establishes the requirements for evaluation, progress, and ongoing enrolment in military educational training centres for incorporation into the ranks of the Armed Forces, any violation of academic integrity in the assessment process, as well as the cooperation in it will result in the assignment of a failing grade to the student (zero) for the entire course in the corresponding assessment opportunity, regardless of the percentage of importance that the test in question had in the overall continuous assessment, and independently of other disciplinary actions that may be applied. In the academic activities and assignments of this course, the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) tools is allowed, used in an ethical, critical and responsible manner. In case you have used GAI, you should critically evaluate any results it provides, carefully verify any citations or references generated, and declare the use of these tools. It is not necessary to disclosure the use of GAI in tasks that do not produce content (proofreading language - spelling or grammar - in a document, translating text, obtaining suggestions to reorganize content or modify the style of a document, or to adapt the format of bibliographic references). AI-generated content (text, images, etc.) must be disclosured and correctly referenced, providing, at least, the following elements: generated content, prompt used in the query, tool used, version, company authoring the software, date on which the query was made and the link to the tool's website. The detection of situations involving non-disclosure of GAI will be considered academic fraud and the measures described in the previous paragraph will be applied.