Guia docente 2024_25 Centro Universitario da Defensa da Escola Naval Militar de Marín

Fundamentals of manufacturing systems and technologies

Assessment

	Description	Qualification	Training and Learning Results
Lecturing	The theoretical contents will be evaluated through 1 intermediate control compulsory (PI) during the course, marked on 10 points.	30		B3	C15	D2 D8 D9 D17 D20
Laboratory practical	The evaluation of the practices will carry out by means of memories (MP) or questionnaires of the activity made in the no included practices in the Mentioned Work, this is, the practices 1 to 6 that they will be able to be individual or in group. Students will have to deliver these activities when finalising the practice. The format of each memory will be specified in each practice. The note of each memory of practices will be on 10 points. The note of the Memories of Practices (MP) will be the average of the notes of the practices 1 to 6.	10		B3	C15	D2 D8 D9 D10 D17
Mentored work	Students will have to make a work in group on a subject of the matter, that will suppose 20% of the qualification. For his realisation, will have 1 session of laboratory and 4 seminars. The work will have to be evaluated so that it guarantee the individual exigibility and the possitive interdependency, this is, all the members of the group have to contribute to the final product and have to know all the parts of the project. All have to show, therefore, deep knowledge of the product delivered, independently of the part in which they had centred their efforts.	20
Objective questions exam	It will make a final examination that will cover the whole of the contents of the subject, so many theorists like practical, and that it will be able to include ask type test, questions of reasoning, resolution of problems and development of practical cases. It demands reach a minimum qualification of 4 points on 10 possible to be able to surpass the subject.	40

Other comments on the Evaluation
The final evaluation of the student will be the following, being his note of continuous evaluation (NEC): NEC = 0,3 * PI + 0,1 * MP + 0,2 * TT + 0,40 * PF To pass the subject by evaluation continuous demands a note NEC equal or upper to 5 points. However, there are some requests in any of the sections to guarantee the balance between all the types of competitions. These requests are: 1. The completion and delivery of all the previous grades, both internships and supervised work 2. Obtain an equal or upper note to 4 points on 10 in the final proof of evaluation continuous (PF). The students with NEC inferior to 5 or that do not fulfil any of the two previous requests have to go to the ordinary examination to be able to surpass the subject. For those students that do not fulfil the two requests the final note of evaluation continuous obtains eat: FINAL NEC = min (4, NEC). Indeed, offers the option to attend to the ordinary examination to all those students who want to improve their results. Ordinary and extraordinary exams will include at least one question concerning the tasks made during the practical sessions. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: Students are expected to show adequate ethical behaviour, committing to act honestly. Based on article 42.1 of the Regulation on the evaluation, qualification and quality of teaching and the student learning process of the University of Vigo, as well as point 6 of the fifth rule of Order DEF/711/2022, of July 18, which establishes the requirements for evaluation, progress, and ongoing enrolment in military educational training centres for incorporation into the ranks of the Armed Forces, any violation of academic integrity in the assessment process, as well as the cooperation in it will result in the assignment of a failing grade to the student (zero) for the entire course in the corresponding assessment opportunity, regardless of the percentage of importance that the test in question had in the overall continuous assessment, and independently of other disciplinary actions that may be applied. In the academic activities and assignments of this course, the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) tools is allowed, used in an ethical, critical and responsible manner. In case you have used GAI, you should critically evaluate any results it provides, carefully verify any citations or references generated, and declare the use of these tools. It is not necessary to disclosure the use of GAI in tasks that do not produce content (proofreading language - spelling or grammar - in a document, translating text, obtaining suggestions to reorganize content or modify the style of a document, or to adapt the format of bibliographic references). AI-generated content (text, images, etc.) must be disclosured and correctly referenced, providing, at least, the following elements: generated content, prompt used in the query, tool used, version, company authoring the software, date on which the query was made and the link to the tool's website. The detection of situations involving non-disclosure of GAI will be considered academic fraud and the measures described in the previous paragraph will be applied.