| Seminars |
The written report on a subject related to the subject chosen by each group of students is evaluated. The content, the inclusion of additional documentation, the presentation, graphics, diagrams, photographs, etc., are valued.
The evaluation criteria will adjust to the contents of the rubric of the TFG proposed by the faculty (not to the percentages). |
20 |
A3
|
B1
B2
B4
|
C12
|
D3
D4
D5
|
| Presentation |
Items to evaluate:
Structure and quality of the presentation.
Adjust to the set time.
Use of language with scientific rigor.
Attitude during the presentation |
20 |
A3
|
B2
B4
|
C8
C12
|
D3
D4
D5
|
| Essay questions exam |
Written exam of a theoretical-practical nature on the fundamental contents of the subject. |
35 |
A1
A3
|
B2
B4
|
C8
C12
|
D3
|
|
It is recalled that attendance at face-to-face activities is mandatory.
As a general rule, the evaluation at the first opportunity will be continuous. To pass the subject it will be necessary to achieve a score of at least 40% of the individual evaluation of the seminars, the presentation and the examination of development questions. In case of not reaching said 40% in any of these three tests, the final mark will be equal to the final weighted average, multiplied by 0.5.
GLOBAL EVALUATION METHOD: It must be requested by each student in the form and term indicated by the center. It will consist of a single theoretical-practical exam that will account for 100% of the evaluation.
SECOND CHANCE EVALUATION: It will consist of a single theoretical-practical exam that will account for 100% of the evaluation.
Students who take this subject are required to behave responsibly and honestly (See Title VII of the Regulations on the evaluation, qualification and quality of teaching and the student learning process).
|
