Guia docente 2023_24
Centro Universitario da Defensa da Escola Naval Militar de Marín
Master Universitario en Dirección TIC para la defensa
 Subjects
  Wireless and optical communication systems
   Assessment
  Description Qualification Training and Learning Results
Self-assessment Mechanism in which, by means of a series of questions or activities, it is possible for the student to evaluate autonomously his/her degree of acquisition of knowledge and skills on the subject, allowing a self-regulation of the personal learning process. There will be two intermediate tests (PE1 and PE2) to control the follow-up of the subject. Each control test has a weight of 20%. The first test, which will cover topics 1 to 4, will be carried out in the on-line phase and will have a duration of 1 hour. The second test, which will cover topics 5 and 6, will take place during the on-site phase and will last 30 minutes. 40 A6
A7
A8
A9
B1
B2
B6
C12
C13
D6
Presentation Presentation by the students, individually or in groups, of a topic related to the contents of the subject or of the results of a work, exercise, project, etc. The work will be evaluated in the on-site phase (T). 20 A6
A7
A8
A9
A10
B1
B2
B6
C12
C13
D5
D6
Problem and/or exercise solving Resolution of different exercises (E) proposed in class on assumptions applicable to each of the topics of the syllabus that will be evaluated during the on-line phase. 25 A6
A7
A8
A9
A10
B1
B2
B6
C12
C13
D5
D6
Laboratory practice Evaluation of different laboratory practices related to the course syllabus by means of deliverable reports (PL). 15 A6
A7
A8
A9
A10
B1
B2
B6
C12
C13
D5
D6
 
Other comments on the Evaluation

If we call MED_CON the  average grade of continuous assessment, which is calculated as:

MED_CON = 0.2*PE1 + 0.2*PE2 + 0.2*T + 0.25*E + 0.15*PL

It is necessary to obtain at least 50% of the grade to pass the course.

In case the student fails to pass the course in the ordinary call, he/she will have the right to a second evaluation opportunity (extraordinary call) on the dates established for this purpose by the Master's Academic Committee. The evaluation of the second call will be carried out in distance mode, through the evaluation of a deliverable (work) that will account for 60% of the grade and the completion of a written test (with development questions and / or test type) using telematic means, which will account for the remaining 40%. It will be necessary to obtain at least 50% of the grade to pass the course.. 

 

Assessment systems

Denomination

Qualification (%)

Competences

Evaluation of deliverables (work)

60

CB6, CB7, CB8, CB9, CB10

CG1, CG2, CG6

CT5, CT6

CE12, CE13

Written test

40

CB6, CB7, CB8, CB9, CB10

CG1, CG2, CG6

CT5, CT6

CE12, CE13


ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: 

Students are expected to show adequate ethical behaviour, committing to act honestly. Based on article 42.1 of the Regulation on the evaluation, qualification and quality of teaching and the student learning process of the University of Vigo,any
violation of academic integrity in the assessment process, as well as
the cooperation in it will result in the assignment of a failing grade
to the student (zero) for the entire course in the corresponding
assessment opportunity, 
regardless of the percentage of importance
that the test in question had in the overall continuous assessment and
independently of other disciplinary actions that may be applied.

In the event that there is any difference between the Galician/Spanish/English guides related to evaluation the Spanish guide will always prevaill.
Universidade de Vigo            | Reitoría | Campus Universitario | C.P. 36.310 Vigo (Pontevedra) | España | Tlf: +34 986 812 000