Guia docente 2020_21 Escola de Enxeñaría de Telecomunicación

Máster Universitario en Ciberseguridade

Assessment

	Description	Qualification	Training and Learning Results
Project based learning	The students will work in groups in the design, implementation and proof of an IoT, with a special emphasis in security. The same group of students will perform attacks to the security of the systems implemented by other groups or by third parties. The results (project and reports containing the outcomes of the attacks) will be evaluated after the delivery, having into account key aspects such as the correction, the quality, the performance and the functionalities. It will be mandatory to deliver the code, prototypes and documentation. It will be also necessary make a public presentation of the results. In addition, during the implementation of the project, the design and the evolution of the development will be evaluated. If the intermediate results are not satisfactory, a penalization of the 20% of the grade could be applied. The evaluation will be by group and by person: each one of the members of a team must document his/her tasks and answer the questions related to them.	80	A2 A3 A4	B1 B2 B5	C4 C9	D4 D5
Lecturing	Students will complete one or several exams to asses what they have learned in master lessons. In case there is more than one exam, the result will be the arithmetic mean of the different tests.	20	A2 A3 A4	B1 B2	C4 C9

Other comments on the Evaluation
In order to pass the course it is necessary to complete the different parts of the subject (exam or exams about the master sessions and project). The final grade will be the weighted geometric mean of the grades of the different parts. For example, If "NT" is the grade obtained for the master sessions and "NP" for the project, the final grade will be: Grade = NT^0.2 ✕ NP^0.8 During the first month, students must provide a written declaration to opt for single evaluation. In other case, it will be considered that they opt for continuous evaluation. Students who select continuous evaluation and submit the first task or questionnaire may not be listed as "Absent". Students who opt for the final assessment procedure have to submit also a dossier that must be defended in-person in front of the professors, with detailed information about the events and issues that arose during the execution of the different tasks, and especially the project. In addition, during the first month of the course, professors will notify students who opted for final assessment if they have to do the tutored work individually. Second call to pass the course Students can opt to the second call only if they didn't pass the first call (at the end of the semester). The evaluation procedure is the presented in the previous sections, but t will be necessary to submit an additional dossier that must be defended in-person in front of the professors, with detailed information about the events and issues that arose during the execution of the different tasks, and especially the project. Students that have opted by the continuous evaluation procedure, can decide to maintain the grades of the different parts of the subject obtained in the first call or discard them. Other comments Although the project will be completed (if possible) in groups, each student should keep a record of his or her activities. In the case in which the performance of a member of the group wouldn't be adequate compared with the performance of his or her team mates, he or she could be excluded from the group and/or qualified individually. The use of any material during the tests will have to be explicitly authorized. In case of detection of plagiarism or unethical behavior in any of the tasks/tests done, the final grade will be "failed (0)" and the professors will communicate the incident to the academic authorities to take the appropriate measures.