Students can decide to be evaluated according to a continuous evaluation model or a single evaluation model. All students who submit the report of the first case study are opting for continuous assessment. Once the students choose the continuous assessment model, their grade can never be "Not Submitted".

The grade will be the result of applying the weighted average between results: (i) written exam (50%) (ii) case studies (40%), and (iii) mentored work (10%).

Written exam: will take place on the dates published in the official calendar.

1- Continuous evaluation model. Reports of 2 case studies and 2 evaluations of the peer reports that will be delivered in the weeks indicated in the document that will be provided to students on the first day of class. One report will be on risk analysis and the other on the development of a security plan (ISMS). Each report will have a weight in the final grade of 15% and each evaluation of 5%. The reports will be developed in a group and all students in the same group will receive the same grade. The evaluations will be carried out individually. It is also necessary to carry out a supervised work on a subject of the subject to be presented in group A.

2- Single evaluation model. Individual delivery of the 2 reports of the two practical cases on the same date of the written exam published in the official calendar. In this case, the evaluation of peer reports will not be carried out and each report will have a weight in the final grade of 25%.

In the second-chance assessment, students will be evaluated using the single evaluation modality.

If plagiarism is detected in any of the assessment tests, the final grade of the subject will be "Suspenso (0)", a fact that will be communicated to the school's management to adopt the appropriate measures.