The regular assistance to the theoretical and recitatio classes and the degree of participation in them is considered an important part of the course and will be taken into account in the continuous evaluation since it will be key for the realisation of the short answer tests. By regular assistance is meant not reaching 3 unjustified faults of assistance.

The evaluation of any student that assist regularly to class will follow the criteria of continuous evaluation. The rest will be evaluated by the criteria of evaluation for non assisting students.

CRITERIA OF EVALUATION FOR ASSISTING STUDENTS, 1st EDITION OF RECORDS

The final grade, N, will be calculated by the formula:

N = 0,72 * E + 0,28 * P

where E is the average the the marks, between 0 and 10, obtained in each the three midterm exams, and P is the average of the marks, between 0 and 10, obtained in the tests given in the recitation classes.

Evaluated competencies: CB1, CG8, CE1, CT4, CT6, CT11.

Evaluated learning outcomes: RA1 to RA23.

CRITERIA OF EVALUATION FOR NON ASSISTING STUDENTS

Methodology/Single Test: Evaluation of theory and problems.

Description: Written exam that will include evaluation of theoretical concepts and resolution of exercises.

% Qualification: 100%.

Evaluated Competences: CB1, CG8, CE1, CT4, CT6, CT11.

Evaluated Learning outcomes: RA1 to the RA23.

CRITERIA OF EVALUATION FOR 2nd EDITION AND END OF CAREER

The same system of evaluation applied for non assisting students will be used.

PROCESS OF ASSIGNING THE FINAL GRADE

Independently of the announcement, the final grade will be the symmetrical round to 1 decimal places of the final grade obtained in the course: Round ( N , 1 ).

Grade of "No Presentado": The final grade in the first or second announcement will be of "No Presentado" in case –and only in case– of not to having written the corresponding final examination.

DATES OF EVALUATION

The calendar of exams approved officially by the Xunta of Centre of the ESEI is published in the following web page: https://esei.uvigo.es/docencia/exames/.

OTHER OBSERVATIONS

TESTS OF CONTINUOUS EVALUATION AND EXAMS: For any student, in order to be admitted to taking any of the three midterm exams or any of the final examinations, he or she must register for it through the corresponding online tool (in Faitic) within the period established to that end, which will be announced at least 5 days in advance.

ETHICAL CODE AND ETHICAL COMMITMENT:

It is expected of all students an ethical behaviour in all the evaluation tests and exams, in which the answers given by the students should truly reflect the real knowledge an preparation attained in the course. The students must remember that the Estatuto del Estudiante Universitario, in the article 13.2.d), establishes for the students the duty of:

"To abstain to use or to help in fraudulent procedures in the evaluation tests, in homework or in official documents of the university".

BREAKING OF THE ETHICAL CODE:

One of the types of infractions of the ethical code is cheating or plagiarizing in homework or exams. This is usually detected when in two pieces of work or exams there appear significant coincidences* which would have been wholly impossible without one author having had access to the work of the other or both to an external source. In such cases there will be considered as of equal gravity the fault of whoever had obtained material from someone else as that of whoever allowed someone to have access to his or her own work.

The penalty for an infraction of the ethical code as described above will be the expulsion form the system of continuous evaluation, so that all involved will be evaluated following the criteria for non assistents. In the case that the infraction takes place in a final exam, the penalty will be thre calification of zero in that exam for all involved.

(*) By a significant coincidence o evidence of cheating is understood a frase or expression of peculiar traits, which is inexplicably repeated identically in different pieces of work or exams and whose repetition none of the involved is capable of explaining to the satisfaction of the teacher.